Most Accurate National IQs Possible
v3
Version 3 (.1)
Methodology: a total of 5,645 means were gathered during the data collection phase, most drawing from Becker’s dataset, PISA, PIRLS, TIMSS, the working memory meta-analysis, and the harmonised learning outcomes.
These means were classified into three categories: international scholastic tests, IQ samples (from Becker’s dataset + some other sources), and the samples from the working memory meta.
The IQ samples were adjusted for the effect of perceived selectivity (e.g. college students or white collar workers would be highly selected samples, janitors would be negatively selected) and location (urban, rural, national, etc). All samples were age-normed prior to the conduction of statistical analysis.
The memory samples were adjusted for the age of testing, year, perceived selectivity, and the type of test (e.g. forward span vs backward span). The standard deviations for these variables also had to be adjusted for these factors. IQs were then calculated using these means and standard deviations. The quality of these averages was nothing short of awful, despite my best efforts; according to the model, some of the samples had average IQs as high as 150 and as low as 40.
Then, all of the samples were combined into one file and subject to an anchoring process which controls all of the samples for bias at the category level. For example, if the PISA math test from 2008 gives scores 20 points higher in comparison to what would be expected from the set of tested countries, the scores were adjusted downwards by 20 points. The reference group (IQ = 100) is white Britons.
I then grouped the tests into six different categories: PIRLS, TIMSS, memory, PISA, IQ, and all other tests (other). I gave weights of 3 to the PIRLS, TIMSS, PISA, and ‘other’ averages, a weight of 2 to the IQ averages, and a weight of 1 to the memory averages. No manual revisions were made and I refused to impute the IQs of Turkmenistan, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guinea with proxies like performance in the IMO.
I also calculated the standard errors of these estimates by taking the standard deviation of the sample means and dividing it by the square root of the number of them1. Countries with only one sample had their standard errors estimated based on the observed relationship between number of samples and standard error:
On average, each country had a standard error of 1.53. This is a 41% improvement from the prior dataset (V2) which had an estimated average standard error of 2.58.
Countries that were missing in this version of the dataset were either left blank or had their value imputed from the previous version2.
National IQ FAQ
Do IQ tests have a regional bias?
I reviewed the literature in this preprint and couldn’t come to a definitive conclusion. There is one study (Wicherts’, I believe) that found that GPA and IQ were less correlated in Africa than they were in Europe, but that could also be an artefact of worse grading. Most of the tools traditionally used to assess bias (differential item testing, comparing g-loadings across groups) find little evidence of bias, but I personally don’t think these methods work well.
When it comes to bias testing, the golden standard is taking variables that are assumed to be racially unbiased (e.g. education, income), regressing those onto IQ between groups, and observing if the slopes/intercepts differ to a practical/statistical extent. To my knowledge, there has been no attempt to do this across countries.
Speaking clearly, I think the largest issue with comparing cognitive tests across countries are education and effort. Education causes people’s IQ scores to increase because they become more familiar with standardised testing and improve their skills in maths/reading, but don’t actually get more intelligent. As such, more educated countries should have higher IQ scores that are not reflective of superior general intelligence. Some people have theories that IQ tests are biased by effort across countries, but I don’t see much evidence for this; empirical attempts to assess the question have found the opposite (check the appendix of said paper).
Alternatively, one could argue that there are factors that shrink the observed averages, like using between group standard deviations and imperfectly g-loaded tests. Overall, I would guess that the differences between countries are slightly inflated.
Is the average IQ in Sub-Saharan Africa really 70?
More or less. The score is reflective of their ability to take cognitive tests. An IQ of 70 is commonly used as a cutoff for intellectual disability in the United States, but I should note that this is not a hard cutoff and there is general agreement that IQ alone cannot be used to diagnose intellectual disability. I suspect that, controlling for education and measurement invariance, the true IQ of Sub-Saharan Africa is closer to 75.
Is the average IQ in China really 101?
The average is inflated by several points because Eastern provinces and urban areas are oversampled. A nationally representative sample of China would probably score somewhere between 95 and 100.
How much does biased collection play a role in the differences across countries?
Almost none. Lynn made some mistakes in the collection of the data but he was making an honest effort from what can be inferred.
About half of the data come from international scholastic assessments that take (roughly) representative samples of students and compare them in terms of their ability. Despite the samples being massive and the data collection being conducted by an independent body, the scores on these tests correlate reasonably well with the ones found in IQ tests:

Are any of these values based on geographical imputations?
No.
Do you have any concerns with the estimates of specific countries?
I think that China probably has an IQ in the upper 90s, Mynamar in the mid 80s, Kazakhstan in the upper 80s, and North Korea in the low 90s.
I think the North Korean IQ is deflated by sampling refugees who live in South Korea and I think the Chinese IQ is inflated because Eastern provinces higher in intelligence are disproportionately sampled. I don’t have any specific comments on the others but they seem to be at odds with their levels of development and cultural prominence.
V3 Appendix:
Average IQ by region:
region mean_IQ
<chr> <dbl>
1 Eastern Asia 99.823
2 Western Europe 99.794
3 Northern Europe 98.801
4 Australia and New Zealand 98.721
5 Northern America 96.111
6 Eastern Europe 96.004
7 Southern Europe 91.588
8 South-eastern Asia 88.311
9 Polynesia 86.841
10 Central Asia 85.608
11 Western Asia 83.863
12 Micronesia 82.047
13 Latin America and the Caribbean 82.007
14 Southern Asia 78.556
15 Melanesia 78.513
16 Northern Africa 78.503
17 Sub-Saharan Africa 69.308Values:
alpha3 name NIQ se
1 HKG Hong Kong SAR China 105.689 0.846
2 SGP Singapore 105.317 0.923
3 JPN Japan 104.964 0.556
4 TWN Taiwan 104.870 1.073
5 KOR South Korea 103.270 0.915
6 LIE Liechtenstein 102.050 0.734
7 EST Estonia 101.553 0.315
8 FIN Finland 101.335 0.838
9 CHN China 101.286 1.503
10 MAC Macao SAR China 101.206 0.610
11 CHE Switzerland 101.055 0.669
12 AUT Austria 100.735 0.905
13 NLD Netherlands 100.724 0.654
14 CAN Canada 100.106 0.817
15 IRL Ireland 99.923 0.637
16 HUN Hungary 99.791 0.422
17 SWE Sweden 99.778 0.348
18 AUS Australia 99.619 0.703
19 LUX Luxembourg 99.479 0.594
20 RUS Russia 99.432 0.431
21 GBR United Kingdom 99.406 0.584
22 CZE Czechia 99.396 0.283
23 DEU Germany 99.152 0.724
24 DNK Denmark 99.025 0.414
25 VNM Vietnam 98.904 1.706
26 SVN Slovenia 98.841 0.513
27 USA United States 98.770 0.465
28 POL Poland 98.398 0.611
29 BEL Belgium 98.380 0.641
30 BLR Belarus 98.035 1.918
31 SVK Slovakia 97.884 0.381
32 NZL New Zealand 97.823 0.546
33 NOR Norway 97.804 0.472
34 LVA Latvia 97.423 0.407
35 SCO Scotland 97.308 0.384
36 LTU Lithuania 97.123 0.358
37 FRA France 96.774 0.609
38 HRV Croatia 96.464 0.696
39 ISL Iceland 96.140 0.531
40 ITA Italy 95.478 0.471
41 PRT Portugal 95.223 0.691
42 MMR Myanmar (Burma) 95.079 3.362
43 ISR Israel 94.981 0.776
44 ESP Spain 94.733 0.902
45 CYP Cyprus 93.698 0.559
46 BGR Bulgaria 93.345 0.864
47 GRC Greece 92.931 0.551
48 KAZ Kazakhstan 92.868 1.177
49 BMU Bermuda 92.844 1.624
50 GRL Greenland 92.725 2.491
51 SRB Serbia 92.354 1.147
52 MLT Malta 92.233 0.595
53 MYS Malaysia 91.854 0.788
54 MNG Mongolia 91.801 3.429
55 UKR Ukraine 91.572 0.613
56 MDA Moldova 91.524 0.760
57 BRB Barbados 91.365 2.785
58 ARM Armenia 91.097 1.132
59 TUR Turkey 90.913 0.544
60 ROU Romania 90.664 0.534
61 ALB Albania 90.510 1.015
62 BRN Brunei 90.060 0.920
63 WSM Samoa 90.000 2.493
64 CHL Chile 89.460 0.625
65 TCA Turks & Caicos Islands 89.400 2.494
66 PLW Palau 89.287 NA
67 THA Thailand 89.181 0.949
68 URY Uruguay 89.088 0.464
69 COK Cook Islands 89.000 2.494
70 BIH Bosnia & Herzegovina 88.339 1.122
71 CRI Costa Rica 88.190 1.048
72 MEX Mexico 88.046 0.839
73 MNE Montenegro 88.000 0.351
74 PRI Puerto Rico 87.930 1.849
75 SUR Suriname 87.843 NA
76 TJK Tajikistan 87.710 2.495
77 TTO Trinidad & Tobago 87.523 0.547
78 LKA Sri Lanka 87.375 2.541
79 GEO Georgia 87.199 0.526
80 ARE United Arab Emirates 86.866 0.526
81 BHR Bahrain 86.700 0.727
82 AZE Azerbaijan 86.512 1.111
83 ARG Argentina 86.172 0.897
84 VIR U.S. Virgin Islands 86.100 3.695
85 VEN Venezuela 85.802 3.771
86 PRK North Korea 85.500 3.500
87 NCL New Caledonia 85.000 2.496
88 MUS Mauritius 84.978 1.716
89 BOL Bolivia 84.970 4.784
90 BHS Bahamas 84.733 2.557
91 MKD North Macedonia 84.587 0.705
92 BRA Brazil 84.389 0.864
93 COL Colombia 84.365 1.157
94 PER Peru 84.265 0.694
95 FJI Fiji 84.000 2.497
96 MHL Marshall Islands 83.960 2.497
97 IRN Iran 83.751 0.752
98 TUN Tunisia 83.486 1.322
99 UZB Uzbekistan 83.321 2.307
100 JAM Jamaica 82.915 2.188
101 QAT Qatar 82.755 1.064
102 CUB Cuba 82.507 1.489
103 ECU Ecuador 82.209 1.688
104 IDN Indonesia 82.162 0.816
105 OMN Oman 82.026 0.845
106 LBN Lebanon 81.966 0.940
107 TON Tonga 81.522 2.520
108 SAU Saudi Arabia 81.421 0.787
109 LAO Laos 81.350 3.336
110 TKM Turkmenistan 81.260 NA
111 DOM Dominican Republic 81.230 1.020
112 SYC Seychelles 81.198 1.061
113 KIR Kiribati 81.180 2.499
114 ANT Netherlands Antilles 81.035 2.499
115 MNP Northern Mariana Islands 81.000 2.499
116 KSV Kosovo 80.954 0.573
117 JOR Jordan 80.884 0.815
118 KHM Cambodia 80.729 2.817
119 PSE Palestinian Territories 80.630 0.912
120 GTM Guatemala 80.366 0.663
121 PAN Panama 80.087 0.660
122 IRQ Iraq 79.664 3.252
123 PHL Philippines 79.475 1.841
124 SLV El Salvador 79.326 1.051
125 HND Honduras 79.290 1.433
126 KWT Kuwait 79.162 1.305
127 DZA Algeria 79.134 0.811
128 SDN Sudan 78.713 1.604
129 KGZ Kyrgyzstan 78.535 2.334
130 IND India 78.533 1.428
131 KEN Kenya 78.456 1.253
132 SYR Syria 78.222 2.132
133 NIC Nicaragua 77.966 2.501
134 LBY Libya 77.812 2.580
135 PRY Paraguay 77.764 1.595
136 GAB Gabon 77.537 1.970
137 SWZ Eswatini 77.407 0.635
138 NPL Nepal 77.332 0.303
139 EGY Egypt 77.331 1.627
140 TLS Timor-Leste 77.304 0.702
141 MDV Maldives 77.260 NA
142 BWA Botswana 76.902 0.657
143 AFG Afghanistan 76.400 2.502
144 MRT Mauritania 76.400 2.502
145 BTN Bhutan 76.312 NA
146 BGD Bangladesh 76.188 3.660
147 CYM Cayman Islands 76.000 2.502
148 GUY Guyana 75.573 NA
149 KNA St. Kitts & Nevis 75.516 NA
150 SLB Solomon Islands 75.486 2.502
151 ATG Antigua & Barbuda 75.470 NA
152 BDI Burundi 75.312 2.094
153 SOM Somalia 75.202 2.503
154 GRD Grenada 74.671 NA
155 MAR Morocco 74.541 0.781
156 PNG Papua New Guinea 74.381 4.383
157 TZA Tanzania 74.150 2.578
158 VUT Vanuatu 73.695 2.504
159 NRU Nauru 73.569 NA
160 ZNZ Zanzibar 73.537 3.345
161 ETH Ethiopia 73.141 3.002
162 ZWE Zimbabwe 73.024 1.761
163 BFA Burkina Faso 72.936 2.310
164 ERI Eritrea 72.619 5.112
165 MOZ Mozambique 72.547 2.391
166 RWA Rwanda 72.367 1.998
167 GMB Gambia 72.063 1.734
168 CPV Cape Verde 71.260 NA
169 ZAF South Africa 71.156 1.485
170 VCT St. Vincent & Grenadines 70.880 2.505
171 PAK Pakistan 70.311 3.617
172 UGA Uganda 70.099 2.101
173 SEN Senegal 69.972 1.108
174 AGO Angola 69.817 5.257
175 GNQ Equatorial Guinea 69.667 2.506
176 MWI Malawi 69.269 1.700
177 SSD South Sudan 68.818 2.062
178 LBR Liberia 68.757 1.570
179 NGA Nigeria 68.535 1.617
180 BLZ Belize 67.914 2.507
181 BEN Benin 67.181 1.894
182 LCA St. Lucia 67.109 NA
183 HTI Haiti 66.902 2.008
184 NAM Namibia 66.873 1.252
185 LSO Lesotho 66.423 0.662
186 CMR Cameroon 66.199 1.147
187 DMA Dominica 66.040 0.250
188 COG Congo - Brazzaville 65.653 1.459
189 COD Congo - Kinshasa 64.951 1.042
190 YEM Yemen 64.839 3.115
191 GHA Ghana 64.516 1.224
192 GNB Guinea-Bissau 64.260 NA
193 CAF Central African Republic 64.000 2.510
194 MDG Madagascar 63.983 2.912
195 ZMB Zambia 63.654 1.541
196 SLE Sierra Leone 62.818 2.718
197 CIV Côte d’Ivoire 62.755 0.815
198 STP São Tomé & Príncipe 62.260 NA
199 TGO Togo 62.210 1.179
200 GIN Guinea 62.094 1.757
201 COM Comoros 60.355 2.512
202 MLI Mali 60.348 1.919
203 TCD Chad 60.046 1.076
204 DJI Djibouti 60.000 2.512
205 NER Niger 58.249 1.981(The following statistics do not include the countries that are not present in the data of V3 but were in V2).
Correlation matrix:
Sample mean and estimated standard error:
Correlation between GDP per capita (IMF data, PPP controlled) and IQ:
World IQ: 85.8
Link to dataset (it’s the last file).
Version 2
White British mean/SD set to 500/100.
Methodology: composite of various datasets. Paper will be out in a few months.
Preprint is now out!
World IQ: 85.6 weighted by population
Technically this estimates the standard error of the mean of all samples (not weighted subcategories), though I thought that this standard error would be a better estimate of the error in the estimates than the one that would be calculated from the subcategories.
Change introduced in V 3.1










Better is to predict many external outcomes and average across them to find the best set of estimates. This is best on the assumption that maximizing reliability and construct validity will maximizing predictive validity. I suggest you download the SPI and use the indicators as your outcomes. Average across them (remember to use absolute values, or reverse by the S factor loading), and see which set does the best. https://www.socialprogress.org/
National IQ have been my main obsession for the last few days. Spending countless of hours. Figuring out the correct numbers etc.
Thank you for this beautiful post seb. This feels like Christmas